of Unauthorized Use of Campaign Ideas
Nigel Hughes, leader of the Alliance for Change (AFC), has issued a formal response to allegations made by Nakisha Sinclair regarding the unauthorized use of her campaign ideas. This comes after Sinclair demanded USD 7,000, which the AFC views as an attempt at extortion.
In a letter addressed to Sinclair, Hughes emphasized that the AFC “specifically and unreservedly denies” entering into any agreement with Sinclair’s company, Trifusion Consultancy, for the provision of policy content or related materials. He stated that their searches of the Commercial Registry revealed no filings or registrations pertaining to the intellectual property in question.
Hughes highlighted that Sinclair’s demand for payment coincided with the ongoing election campaign, which he described as an effort to extort money based on unfounded claims regarding ideas that have been in the public domain for decades. The letter firmly rejected all claims made by Sinclair and indicated that the AFC is prepared to defend against any legal proceedings.
In her subsequent response, Sinclair acknowledged that there was no formal written contract between her company and the AFC. However, she pointed out several factual and legal inaccuracies in Hughes’ initial letter.
“In my response, I must clarify and correct several inaccuracies contained in your letter,” Sinclair wrote, confirming the absence of a formal agreement.
Hughes concluded his communication by expressing his readiness to challenge Sinclair’s assertions in court, stating, “We wish Ms. Sinclair well in her assertions of ownership of ideas that have been in the public domain for decades and look forward to meeting her in court.”
As the situation develops, the political landscape remains charged, with the AFC seeking to navigate these allegations amid the upcoming election.
Other News
Celebrating Ms. Shevon Rambharrat: A Pillar of Excellence at Micobie Primary School
