In a detailed Facebook post, businessman Nazar Mohamed has publicly accused the government of Guyana of orchestrating a campaign of political persecution against him and his family over the past two years. He asserts that their experiences are marked by unlawful and unconstitutional actions, claiming that the state is using its institutions to intimidate and harass them due to their political stance.
“The campaign of persecution began shortly after a Reuters article referenced sanctions allegedly confirmed by a senior government source,” Mohamed wrote. He described the subsequent actions of the government as coordinated punishment rather than lawful proceedings, highlighting the involvement of a well-known lawyer and local informants.
According to Mohamed, his family has suffered severe consequences, including the termination of business licenses, the cancellation of insurance policies, and the refusal to renew essential permits. He recounted instances of political intimidation, including harassment at airports and unwarranted police stops, asserting that these actions represent a blatant misuse of state power.
Mohamed described a particularly humiliating incident involving the public arrest of his son, Azruddin Mohamed, just before Jummuah (Friday prayer). He accused the authorities of displaying a calculated act of intimidation by parading his son handcuffed through Georgetown before a gathering crowd.
He detailed how their financial and social lives have been disrupted, with friends, supporters, and associates also facing similar repercussions, including closed bank accounts and constant surveillance.
The post further alleges that even basic property rights have been violated, with lands legally owned by his family being illegally occupied and excavators installed without consent. Efforts to seek police protection were met with disciplinary actions against officers involved, which Mohamed characterized as “obstruction of justice.”
Despite these challenges, Mohamed stressed that he and his family remain peaceful and dedicated to serving the people of Guyana. He urged the public to recognize the broader implications of his family’s plight, arguing that such state actions could potentially affect anyone.
He concluded his statement by calling on international observers and organizations to take note of the situation, stressing that “democracy cannot exist where the rule of law is selectively applied.” He cautioned that history would remember the present moment and those in power who choose to undermine constitutional values.
Mohamed’s allegations have sparked discussions about the state of governance and political accountability in Guyana as the public awaits official responses from the government regarding these serious claims.
